Thursday, March 20, 2008

What the...?

Sometimes when reading the Bible I get stopped by a what the... verse. This one is pretty odd. It's in Exodus 4. The background is that God tells Moses to go to Egypt and talk to pharoah. Moses is a bit reluctant but he goes to his father in law and asks for permission to go to Egypt and then takes his wife and kids and is on the way when verse 24 happens:
24Along the way at a [resting-] place, the Lord met [Moses] and sought to kill him [made him acutely and almost fatally ill].

25[Now apparently he had failed to circumcise one of his sons, his wife being opposed to it; but seeing his life in such danger] Zipporah took a flint knife and cut off the foreskin of her son and cast it to touch [Moses'] feet, and said, Surely a husband of blood you are to me!

This was the least puzzling translation that I read, but it's still pretty puzzling. If God had issues with Moses, why didn't He discuss them with Moses when He was talking to him about other things?

ETA: I found an interesting answer at http://www.gotquestions.org/kill-Moses.html
Question: "Why was God going to kill Moses in Exodus 4:24-26?"

Answer: The sin of Moses in Exodus 4:24-26 is not stated explicitly, but the surrounding events give substantial clues as to the nature of Moses’ transgression. God had instructed his messenger to warn Pharaoh to free Israel, or risk losing his firstborn son (Exodus 4:21-24). Moses had been specially groomed by God for eighty years for this mission, and now the time for action had come.

Moses was to lead his people out of Egypt, and to be an example to Pharaoh’s house, to the nation of Egypt, and to all the nations that heard of those happenings (Exodus 18:10-11; Joshua 2:10-11). Accordingly, Moses’ personal life had to be in order before he could direct the spiritual lives of the Hebrew people. It seems that Moses had neglected to administer the sacred rite of circumcision, the act that symbolized the Almighty’s covenant with His chosen people.

Perhaps this was the result of pressure from his surrogate Midianite tribe. It is also possible that he was persuaded by Zipporah not to circumcise his son, since she apparently found the practice revolting (4:25). This would explain her violent outburst; she felt that she had saved her husband from death by shedding the blood of her son. Whatever the cause, Moses’ outstanding sin made him unfit to serve as a spiritual leader, and the situation had to be rectified before he could carry out his mission effectively. Indeed, as soon as Zipporah performed the act, the Lord “let him go.” In summary, God was going to kill Moses because Moses was supposed to teach the Israelites God's Law - yet Moses was not obeying God's Law himself.

1 comment:

jordin said...

That is really puzzling. It seems a little out of character for God not to address it directly.